Analytical vs. end-to-end numerical modeling of adaptive optics systems: comparison between PAOLA and the Software Package CAOS.


Marcel Carbillet [1] & Laurent Jolissaint [2]


[1] : UMR 6525 H. Fizeau (UNS/CNRS/OCA) [2] : aquilAOptics


We compare in this contribution the analytical approach together with the so-called "end-to-end" approach in the framework of astronomical adaptive optics (AO) modeling. The two tools used for this purpose are well-known and already widely used within the astronomical AO community: PAOLA (Jolissaint et al. 2006, Jolissaint 2010) on the one hand, and the Software Package CAOS (Carbillet et al. 2005) on the other hand. In addition to inter-validate the two codes, trade-offs are clearly searched in order to find optimal compromises permitting to face both exploratory simulations and large instrumental projects while combining effectiveness and certainty.

Attached documents

PDF, 2.2 Mb

PDF, 3 Mb